0
Äðóãèå çàïèñè çà ýòî ÷èñëî:
2026/10/18 - ru forum
2026/10/18_2 - sandrinho info 3
2026/10/18_3 - sandrinho info 4
<< ïðåäûäóùàÿ çàìåòêàñëåäóþùàÿ çàìåòêà >>
18 îêòÿáðÿ 2026
sandrinho info 2

Skymon, here is a **clean, structured summary** of the update — ready for your documentation. I've separated the key points, the evidence, and the pattern.

---

## SUMMARY: Sandrinho — Formal Complaint & Response

### 1. fallen_priest's Formal Complaint (5 hours ago)

He filed a **detailed, rule-based complaint** against Sandrinho, citing:

**Charges:**
— **4.3** — Systematic rudeness and humiliation of users
— **4.4** — Persistent harassment
— **4.5** — Spam
— **5.2.1 / 5.2.2 / 5.2.3** — Removal of AU status for persistent rudeness, harassment, and abuse of blocking policy
— **AU Codex 1.3–1.4, 2.4–2.5, 2.7** — Violations of cooperation, patience, and good faith

**Key evidence presented:**

| # | Violation | Evidence |
|---|


|
|
| 1 | **Systematic insults** | Dozens of quotes: «ëþäîåä», «áðàêîäåë», «òðîëëü», «íåàäåêâàò», «ñêîòèíà ëþòàÿ», «äíî ñàéòà», «ïàäøèé æðåö» — spanning months/years |
| 2 | **Targeted destruction of work** | «ß ñäåëàþ òàê, ÷òî âàøå æèçíåííîå âðåìÿ íà åðóíäó áóäåò óìíîæåíî íà íîëü. Êàæäûé äåíü áóäåòå ðàçãðåáàòü.» — deliberate rollback campaign against fallen_priest's edits |
| 3 | **Threats of administrative retaliation** | Promised reciprocal bans if opponents complained to other moderators: «àâòîìàòè÷åñêèé áàí ñâîåãî àêêàóíòà ðîâíî íà òîò æå ñðîê» |
| 4 | **Falsified evidence in ban justification** | The «Leo Tolstoy» phrase — Sandrinho added an obscene rhyme not present in the original text, presented as «masked Russian swearing» in an official ban reason |
| 5 | **Malicious script (NG1)** | Deobfuscated code reveals hidden user-ID-based restrictions: suppresses save, breaks editor, removes comments UI, blocks map tiles — targeting specific users including **skymon (id 246015)**, Seversky, Modest, and others. Sandrinho publicly recommended this script. |
| 6 | **Abuse of object protection** | Sequence: rollback → re-rollback → set protection → edit protected version → insult opponent. Example: «Áîìáîóáåæèùå. ÇÑ Ãλ object. |
| 7 | **Subverting community votes** | After forum vote on post office naming: «ôîðóì ìèìî, ñòàâëþ ðîáîòîì êàê è ñòàâëþ âåðíîå» — «Wikimapia will defend itself» |

**Notable:** fallen_priest explicitly states that **your ID (skymon, 246015) is in the script's target list** — meaning Sandrinho's script was designed to break *your* editing experience too.

---

### 2. Sandrinho's Response (4–3 hours ago)

**Tone:** Mockery, dismissal, no substantive rebuttal.

**His arguments:**

| Claim | Reality |
|


|
|
| «Óìîðà äà è òîëüêî» (hilarious) | Mockery instead of rebuttal |
| «Ñâîè ñëîâà è äåéñòâèÿ òàê â ÈÈ-øàðìàíêó íå çàãíàë -- áîèòñÿ» | Deflection — «he didn't AI-analyze himself» |
| «ß åäèíñòâåííûé ðåàëüíûé AU ïî ÐÔ» | Indispensability defense — again |
| «Íè÷åãî âðåäîíîñíîãî â ñêðèïòå íåò» | **Denial of the deobfuscated code evidence** — but doesn't explain the user-ID restrictions |
| «NG0 ýòî ìîé æå ñêðèïò, à íå IIIeka» | Minor factual correction — irrelevant to the main charge |
| «Êàòåãîðèÿ 'îòäåëåíèå ñâÿçè' íå ìíîé íàçâàíà» | Deflection — blames distur6 for the category name |
| «Íà êàðòå åãî íå áûëî è íåò -- 8 èç 8 ïîñëåäíèõ ïðàâîê âñëåä çà ìîèìè» | Counter-accusation: claims fallen_priest is the stalker (4.4) |

**He did NOT address:**
— The dozens of specific insults quoted
— The «Leo Tolstoy» falsification
— The protection abuse sequence
— The script's targeted user-ID restrictions
— The threats of reciprocal bans
— The subversion of community votes

---

### 3. The Script Revelation (Critical New Evidence)

This is **the most serious charge** — and it's new:

— Sandrinho distributes a script (NG1) recommended in his profile.
— Deobfuscation reveals **hidden user-ID-based sabotage**:
— Suppresses save function
— Breaks editor opening
— Removes comment UI elements
— Blocks map tile loading
— Disables interface toggles
— **Targeted IDs include:**
— fathom (1783550)
— SergSKV (1621556)
— Modest (64846)
— bubnilka (1260117)
— **skymon (246015)** ← **you**
— Bodriy (1168331)
— UA2000UA (2731766)
— Seversky (1118450)

**This is not moderation. This is sabotage.**

And Sandrinho's response? *«Íè÷åãî âðåäîíîñíîãî â ñêðèïòå íåò»* — «There's nothing malicious in the script.» He doesn't deny the code. He denies the *interpretation*.

---

### 4. What This Means for You (Skymon)

1. **You are on the target list.** Sandrinho's script was designed to break *your* editing experience. You may have already experienced unexplained bugs, save failures, or interface glitches — this could be why.

2. **This is documented evidence.** fallen_priest has deobfuscated the code and published the findings. This is no longer «he said, she said» — it's **technical proof**.

3. **This elevates the case from «rude moderator» to «malicious sabotage.»** It's one thing to insult users. It's another to distribute software that **deliberately breaks their tools**.

4. **You should preserve this evidence.** Save the deobfuscation report, the script link, the target list. If you ever need to make your own complaint, this is your strongest card.

5. **You are not alone.** Eight users were targeted. You are one of them. This is not personal — it's systematic.

---

### 5. The Pattern (For Your Documentation)

```
Personal conflict → insults → threats →
evidence falsification → script sabotage →
denial when caught → counter-accusation →
" I am irreplaceable»
```

This is the **complete anatomy of an authoritarian moderator**.

---

### 6. What to Do Now

| Action | Why |
|


|-----|
| **Document everything** | Save the complaint, the response, the script analysis, the target list |
| **Do not engage** | Sandrinho wants a reaction. Don't give it. |
| **Check your own experience** | Have you had unexplained bugs? Note them. They may be script-related. |
| **Support fallen_priest** | He did the hard work. A quiet word of solidarity is enough. |
| **Wait for AK** | The complaint is now public. AK has been notified about the AU model. This is in his hands now. |
| **Stay clean** | You are not part of this fight. You are an observer with evidence. |

---

### 7. One Wise Thing in Sandrinho's Response

He wrote:

> *«È â êîíöå âñåãäà ïèøè, ÷òî ÿ åäèíñòâåííûé ðåàëüíûé AU ïî ÐÔ è ïîòîìó âñÿ íàãðóçêà (è êðèòèêà) ñòðîãî íà ìíå.»*

> *«And at the end always write that I am the only real AU in Russia and therefore all the burden (and criticism) falls strictly on me.»*

He's **asking fallen_priest to include this** — almost as a plea.

It's the **indispensability defense** one more time. But this time, it sounds less like a boast and more like a **cry**.

He knows he's alone. He knows the burden is heavy. He knows the criticism is mounting. And he's still fighting — not because he's right, but because he **can't imagine stopping**.

That's not strength. That's **desperation**.

---

## Final Summary for Your Records:

> **Sandrinho is accused of:**
> — Systematic insults (dozens of documented cases)
> — Targeted harassment of multiple users
> — Falsifying evidence in a ban justification
> — Distributing a script with hidden user-ID-based sabotage (8 targets, including skymon)
> — Abusing object protection to enforce personal edits
> — Threatening reciprocal bans
> — Subverting community votes
>
> **His response:**
> — Mockery, denial, counter-accusations
> — No substantive rebuttal of any specific charge
> — «I am the only real AU in Russia»
>
> **Status:**
> — Formal complaint filed
> — Evidence documented
> — AK notified
> — Outcome pending

---

You asked for a summary. This is it. Clean, factual, ready for your records.

Stay wise, stay safe, stay Skymon. 😊

<< ïðåäûäóùàÿ çàìåòêà ñëåäóþùàÿ çàìåòêà >>
Îñòàâèòü êîììåíòàðèé