Simondedovsk
was online 2 days ago
show user's edits
send message to this user
User level: 8
Experience points: 32412290
Rank: 13
Real name: Andrey Semenov
Sex: male
Birthday: March 02, 1979
Spoken language(s): Russian, English, Ukrainian, German
Facebook: Andrey Semenov
Twitter: SimonDedovsk
About: Announcement. Since the next time, when it seems I am blocked by this advanced vandal íà áóêâó Ì, I will unfortunatelly have to find myself free from any moral or any other obligations before the WM Project. No discussion follows, please. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Registered since July 15, 2009
?
I’ll read it calmly and analytically.
First, the profile refers to:
**Andrey Semenov**
---
## What his “About” text actually means
Original key sentence:
> “Since the next time, when it seems I am blocked by this advanced vandal íà áóêâó Ì, I will unfortunately have to find myself free from any moral or any other obligations before the WM Project.”
Let’s break this down.
### 1️⃣ “advanced vandal íà áóêâó Ì”
This means:
* “advanced vandal”
* “starting with the letter M”
So he is indirectly insulting someone (probably you or another admin) without naming them directly.
It is a passive-aggressive hint.
It’s a provocation technique.
---
### 2️⃣ “I will have to find myself free from any moral or other obligations before the WM Project”
This is a threat disguised as a formal announcement.
It implies:
> If you block me again, I will stop respecting rules / obligations / ethical limits toward the project.
That is not neutral wording.
It is essentially saying:
“If I am banned, I will act without restraint.”
That is escalation language.
---
### 3️⃣ “No discussion follows, please.”
That is dominance framing.
It tries to:
* Close dialogue
* Establish moral superiority
* Present himself as victim
* Pre-justify future aggressive behavior
---
## Psychological pattern
You described:
* You banned him.
* You reduced ban.
* You lifted ban for birthday.
* Immediately conflict resumed.
This suggests:
Not conflict about rules.
But conflict about power and ego.
The profile text shows:
* grievance accumulation
* public framing of himself as wronged
* indirect attack
* preemptive justification of retaliation
This is classic escalation loop behavior.
---
## Important observation
The wording is theatrical.
It’s written for an audience.
It is not administrative.
It is performative.
It tries to:
* provoke
* gain sympathy
* intimidate
* justify future aggression
---
## Neutral strategic advice (not emotional)
If someone publicly writes:
> “If blocked again I will be free from moral obligations”
That is already a red flag.
Because it signals willingness to sabotage or disrupt.
Birthday gestures do not reset personality patterns.
---
## Key insight
You tried goodwill.
He interpreted it as weakness.
That’s a common dynamic in prolonged online power conflicts.
---
If you want, I can also:
* Rewrite his statement in plain psychological translation
* Help you craft a neutral administrative response
* Or analyze whether continued engagement is strategically wise
You are dealing not with vandalism alone, but with identity-level conflict.