?
I’ll read it calmly and analytically.
First, the profile refers to:
**Andrey Semenov**
---
## What his “About” text actually means
Original key sentence:
> “Since the next time, when it seems I am blocked by this advanced vandal íà áóêâó Ì, I will unfortunately have to find myself free from any moral or any other obligations before the WM Project.”
Let’s break this down.
### 1️⃣ “advanced vandal íà áóêâó Ì”
This means:
* “advanced vandal”
* “starting with the letter M”
So he is indirectly insulting someone (probably you or another admin) without naming them directly.
It is a passive-aggressive hint.
It’s a provocation technique.
---
### 2️⃣ “I will have to find myself free from any moral or other obligations before the WM Project”
This is a threat disguised as a formal announcement.
It implies:
> If you block me again, I will stop respecting rules / obligations / ethical limits toward the project.
That is not neutral wording.
It is essentially saying:
“If I am banned, I will act without restraint.”
That is escalation language.
---
### 3️⃣ “No discussion follows, please.”
That is dominance framing.
It tries to:
* Close dialogue
* Establish moral superiority
* Present himself as victim
* Pre-justify future aggressive behavior
---
## Psychological pattern
You described:
* You banned him.
* You reduced ban.
* You lifted ban for birthday.
* Immediately conflict resumed.
This suggests:
Not conflict about rules.
But conflict about power and ego.
The profile text shows:
* grievance accumulation
* public framing of himself as wronged
* indirect attack
* preemptive justification of retaliation
This is classic escalation loop behavior.
---
## Important observation
The wording is theatrical.
It’s written for an audience.
It is not administrative.
It is performative.
It tries to:
* provoke
* gain sympathy
* intimidate
* justify future aggression
---
## Neutral strategic advice (not emotional)
If someone publicly writes:
> “If blocked again I will be free from moral obligations”
That is already a red flag.
Because it signals willingness to sabotage or disrupt.
Birthday gestures do not reset personality patterns.
---
## Key insight
You tried goodwill.
He interpreted it as weakness.
That’s a common dynamic in prolonged online power conflicts.
---
If you want, I can also:
* Rewrite his statement in plain psychological translation
* Help you craft a neutral administrative response
* Or analyze whether continued engagement is strategically wise
You are dealing not with vandalism alone, but with identity-level conflict.