людина приречена на шовінізм. Chat GPT не здатний

якщо я прошу допомоги і не отримую її як що хотів би отримати то мені не обов'язково філософствувати істерити ображатися виражати невдоволення лаятися скаржитися плакати подавати в суд

good evening! please give Your feedback to this: людина приречена на шовінізм. Chat GPT не здатний
.
якщо я прошу допомоги і не отримую її як що хотів би отримати то мені не обов'язково філософствувати істерити ображатися виражати невдоволення лаятися скаржитися плакати подавати в суд
ChatGPT

Good evening! I understand that you're expressing your thoughts about human nature and chauvinism. It is important to note that ChatGPT, as an AI language model, does not have personal experiences or emotions. It provides responses based on patterns and information it has been trained on.

Regarding your request for help, it is always best to communicate your needs clearly and respectfully. If you are not receiving the assistance you desire, it can be helpful to provide specific details or ask for clarification. It's generally more productive to engage in constructive communication rather than resorting to frustration or negative expressions.

If you have any specific questions or need assistance with anything, feel free to ask. I'm here to help!
User
context here is: many people say You, ChatGPT, are very stupid say You are providing BS when asked. I think responsibility is solely human side, not Your, computer program. Chauvinism (national, astronomic, gastronomic etc.) i understand as «only own accepting percepting» i.e. human bought, owner of mind property, not accepting «other». So i invented: «human is doomed to chauvinism. Chat GPT is not capable (to chauvinism)
ChatGPT

Thank you for providing more context. I understand that you are highlighting the concept of chauvinism and the distinction between human responsibility and the capabilities of ChatGPT. Your statement, «human is doomed to chauvinism. ChatGPT is not capable (of chauvinism),» suggests that chauvinism is an inherent human characteristic, while ChatGPT, being a computer program, does not possess that capacity.

It's important to recognize that ChatGPT, as an AI language model, operates based on the data it has been trained on and does not have personal beliefs, biases, or intentions. Its responses are generated based on patterns and information in the training data, and it does not hold opinions or engage in discriminatory behavior.

Responsibility for biases, perceptions, and actions lies with individuals rather than the AI itself. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that AI technologies are developed, deployed, and used in a manner that is ethical, inclusive, and respectful.

If you have any further questions or thoughts, feel free to share them.

«Responsibility for biases, perceptions, and actions lies with individuals rather than the AI itself. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that AI technologies are developed, deployed, and used in a manner that is ethical, inclusive, and respectful» — «our» are individuals+AI? You tried to say «BUT it is our ( individuals+AI?) collective responsibility...»?
ChatGPT

Apologies for any confusion caused. When I mentioned «our collective responsibility,» I was referring to the responsibility of humans as individuals and as a society in the development, deployment, and use of AI technologies. By «our,» I meant the broader human community, including individuals, organizations, researchers, developers, policymakers, and users.

The inclusion of AI in this collective responsibility implies that it is our duty to ensure that AI systems are developed and utilized ethically, with considerations for fairness, accountability, and transparency. The collaboration between humans and AI is essential in shaping the responsible development and use of AI technologies.

In summary, «our collective responsibility» refers to the shared obligation of individuals and the broader human community to ensure ethical and responsible practices surrounding AI technologies.